Global Warming: It is a hoax. It is bad science. It is high-jacking public policy. It is the greatest scam in history.
One hardly knows where in the history of science to look for an important movement that had its effective start in so pure and simple an accident as that which led to the building of the great Washington telescope and went on to the discovery of the satellites of Mars.
As a child I read science fiction but from the very beginnings of my reading for pleasure I read a lot of non-fictional history particularly historical biography.
Gender consciousness has become involved in almost every intellectual field: history literature science anthropology. There's been an extraordinary advance.
Science fiction has its own history its own legacy of what's been done what's been superseded what's so much part of the furniture it's practically part of the fabric now what's become no more than a joke... and so on. It's just plain foolish as well as comically arrogant to ignore all this to fail to do the most basic research.
We're uncomfortable about considering history as a science. It's classified as a social science which is considered not quite scientific.
Tasmanian history is a study of human isolation unprecedented except in science fiction - namely complete isolation from other humans for 10 000 years.
Research is of considerable importance in certain fields such as science and history.
I was a daydreamer and there is a lot of history and geography and science I missed out on because I was in my head. And I regret that.
One would have to have completely forgotten the history of science so as to not remember that the desire to know nature has had the most constant and the happiest influence on the development of mathematics.
What I'm working on now - I'm back to fantasy although considering that it's me I'm turning it into a kind of science fantasy. It's a vampire story - but my vampires are biological vampires. They didn't become vampires because someone bit them they were born that way.
Those theologians who are beginning to take the doctrine of creation very seriously should pay some attention to science's story.
The mysteriousness and mystique of space is such that science fiction attempts to tantalize you by telling you a story that could possibly be out there and that's the appeal of science fiction.
The world would be a very sad place if readers could only love one story.
You want people to feel something when you tell a story whether they feel happy or whether they feel sad.
I'm part of the party getting the crowd fired up singing songs pouring drinks whatever it takes to get them to have a good time. When I walk into the meet-and-greet someone's always going to have a story a sad story or a happy story.
I am co-writing a screenplay now and I'm working on the rights to another story I want to do. So I plan to produce and direct. So for me I don't really feel that I am vulnerable to that sad baggage that comes with the business of filmmaking.
It's an indication of how cynical our society has become that any kind of love story with a sad theme is automatically ridiculed as sentimental junk.
I think the thing's that perhaps sad really is that younger people haven't come in and I think it must have been absolutely fantastic to have worked in the 50's when you had all of the great Broadway composers and when West Side Story didn't win the Tony Award.
Informed by our sad experience of history we require nothing short of a foundation for lasting democracy.
It's very simple I just tell my sad story and people weep.
Atari is a very sad story.
I've always been drawn to Marilyn Monroe but certain aspects of her story may be too sad to tell.
Marketing has supplanted story as the primary force behind the worthiness of making a film and that's a very sad thing. It's film only as a function of consumerism rather than as an important component of our culture and that's everywhere around the world.
He who attends to his greater self becomes a great man and he who attends to his smaller self becomes a small man.